Status- Table of contents Participants Declarations Notes Chapter XI-A Previous treaty Next treaty  

15. Customs Convention on Containers, 1972

Geneva, 2 December 1972

 

Entry into force: 6 December 1975, in accordance with article 19.
Registration: 6 December 1975, No. 14449.
Status: Signatories: 15 ,Parties: 361.
Text: United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 988, p. 43 and depositary notifications C.N.358.1981.TREATIES-1 of 8 December 1981 (amendments to annexes 4 and 6); vol. 1407, p. 389 (amendments to annexes 1, 5, 6 and 7); vol. 1490, p. 531 (amendments to annex 6); vol. 1488, p. 345 (procès-verbal of rectification of the original French and Spanish texts); C.N.276.1988.TREATIES-1 of 1 December 1988 (amendments to article 1, paragraph c and annex 6); C.N.36.1994.TREATIES-1 of 10 March 1994 (amendments to the Convention and annexes 4 and 6); C.N.492.2007.TREATIES-1 of 20 April 2007 (proposal of amendments to Annexes 1 and 4)2.  

Note: The Convention was adopted by the United Nations/IMCO Conference on Containers Traffic, held at Geneva from 13 November to 2 December 1972. The Conference was convened in pursuance of a decision taken by the Economic and Social Council on 22 May 19703 and Council resolutions 1568 (L)4 and 1725 (LIII)5. The Conference adopted a Final Act containing, inter alia, the texts of eight resolutions (see Doc. E/CONF.59/44). The Convention was open for signature until 15 January 1973 at the Office of the United Nations at Geneva and subsequently from 1 February 1973 until 31 December 1973 inclusive at the Headquarters of the United Nations at New York.

 

 

PARTICIPANTS


Participant6  Signature  Ratification, Acceptance (A), Approval (AA), Accession (a), Succession (d) 
Algeria    14 Dec 1978 a 
Armenia    9 Jun 2006 a 
Australia    10 Nov 1975 a 
Austria  22 May 1973  17 Jun 1977 
Azerbaijan    17 Jan 2005 a 
Belarus  22 Oct 1973  1 Sep 1976 
Bulgaria  12 Jan 1973  22 Feb 1977 
Burundi    4 Sep 1998 a 
Canada  5 Dec 1972  10 Dec 1975 
China7    22 Jan 1986 a 
Cuba    23 Nov 1984 a 
Czech Republic8    2 Jun 1993 d 
Finland  26 Dec 1973  22 Feb 1983 A 
Georgia    2 Jun 1999 a 
Greece  11 Jan 1973   
Hungary  10 Jan 1973  12 Dec 1973 
Indonesia    11 Oct 1989 a 
Kazakhstan    25 Jan 2005 a 
Kyrgyzstan    22 Oct 2007 a 
Liberia    16 Sep 2005 a 
Lithuania    27 Mar 2002 a 
Montenegro9    23 Oct 2006 d 
Morocco    14 Aug 1990 a 
New Zealand10    20 Dec 1974 a 
Poland  20 Dec 1972  29 Apr 1982 
Republic of Korea  15 Jan 1973  19 Oct 1984 
Romania  11 Dec 1973  6 Mar 1975 
Russian Federation  18 Oct 1973  23 Aug 1976 
Serbia    6 Sep 2001 a 
Slovakia8    28 May 1993 d 
Spain    16 Apr 1975 a 
Switzerland1  5 Dec 1972  12 Oct 1976 
Trinidad and Tobago    23 Mar 1990 a 
Turkey  15 Dec 1972  13 Jul 1994 
Ukraine  22 Oct 1973  1 Sep 1976 
United States of America  5 Dec 1972  12 Nov 1984 
Uzbekistan    27 Nov 1996 a 
 

 

DECLARATIONS


Declarations and Reservations

(Unless otherwise indicated, the declarations and reservations were made

upon ratification, acceptance, approval, accession or succession.)

Azerbaijan

Reservation:

La République d'Azerbaïdjan n'autorise à entrer sur son territoire ni les conteneurs vides ou chargés en provenance ou à destination de la République d'Arménie ni les conteneurs appartenant à des personnes physiques ou morales immatriculées en République d'Arménie ou contrôlés et exploités par de telles personnes.

Belarus

Upon signature and upon ratification:

The Government of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, which bar certain States from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognized principle of the sovereign equality of States.

As to the provisions of article 25 regarding the settlement by arbitration of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention, the Government of the Byelorussian SSR declares that the adoption of this provision should not be interpreted as changing the view of the Government of the Byelorussian SSR that a dispute may be referred to an arbitration tribunal for consideration only with the consent of all parties to the dispute in each individual case.

Cuba11

Declaration:

The Government of the Republic of Cuba considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Convention are of a discriminatory nature since they deprive certain States of the right to sign and accede to the Convention, contrary to the principle of universality.

With reference to the rules set forth in article 25 of the Con- vention, the Government of the Republic of Cuba considers that differences arising between Parties should be resolved through direct negotiations by diplomatic means.

Czech Republic8

Romania

Upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:

The Government of the Socialist Republic of Romania con- siders that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, concluded at Geneva on 2 December 1972, are not in accordance with the principle that multilateral treaties, the aims and objectives of which concern the world community as a whole, should be open to participation by all States.

Russian Federation

Upon signature and upon ratification:

The Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, which bar certain States from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognized principle of the sovereign equality of States.

As to the provisions of article 25 regarding the settlement by arbitration of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention, the Government of the USSR declares that the adoption of this provision should not be interpreted as changing the view of the Government of the USSR that a dispute may be referred to an arbitration tribunal for consideration only with the consent of all parties to the dispute in each individual case.

Slovakia8

Spain

Reservation to article 9:

Concerning containers granted temporary admission for the carriage of goods in internal traffic, . . . such admission will not be granted in Spain.

Switzerland1

(a) Switzerland shall grant temporary admission to containers, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 6 of the Convention;

(b) The use of containers which have been admitted tempor- arily for internal traffic, as provided for in article 9 of the Convention, shall be authorized subject to the two conditions laid down in annex 3 to the Convention.

Turkey

Upon signature:

With reservations to paragraphs 3 and 4 of article 19.

Ukraine

Upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:

The Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that the provisions of article 18 of the Customs Convention on Containers, 1972, which bar certain States from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognized principle of the sovereign equality of States.

As to the provisions of article 25 regarding the settlement by arbitration of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention, the Government of the Ukrainian SSR declares that the adoption of this provision should not be interpreted as changing the view of the Government of the Ukrainian SSR that a dispute may be referred to an arbitration tribunal for consideration only with the consent of all parties to the dispute in each individual case.

 

 

NOTES


1. With the declaration by which the ratification "shall also apply to the Principality of Liechtenstein for as long as the latter is bound to the Swiss Confederation by a customs union treaty."


2. Amendments to the Convention and annexes were adopted as follows:

Amendments to:  Author of the proposal:  Date of circulation:  Date of entry into force: 
Annexes 4 and 6  Customs Cooperation Council  8 Dec 1981  8 Mar 1983 
Annexes 1, 5, 6 and 7  Customs Cooperation Council  18 June 1984  18 Sep 1985 
Annex 6  Customs Cooperation Council  8 Nov 1985  1 Jan 1988* 
Article 1, par. c, and Annex 6  Customs Cooperation Council  1 Decr 1988  1 Mar 1990 
Annex 4 and 6  Customs Cooperation Council  10 Mar 1994**  10 Jun 1995 
Annexes 1 and 4  Customs Cooperation Council  20 Apr 2007   
*For all the Contracting Parties, except the United States of America and Canada which had objected to the proposed amendments. 
** Amendments were proposed by the Customs Co-operation Council to the Convention and annex 7 of the Convention on that same date. An objection thereto having been made by the Government of the United States of America and received by the Secretary-General on 9 March 1995, that is to say, before the expiry of the twelve-month period provided for in article 21 (4), the said amendments are deemed not to have been accepted. 


3. Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, Resumed Forty-eighth Session, Supplement No. 1A (E/4832/Add.1), p.15.


4. Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, Fiftieth Session, Supplement No. 1 (E/5044), p. 3.


5. Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, Fifty-third Session, Supplement No. 1 (E/5209), p. 5.


6. The German Democratic Republic had acceded to the Convention with a declaration on 4 October 1974. For the text of the declaration, see United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 988, p. 253. See also note 2 regarding "Germany" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.


7. See note 2 under "China" regarding Hong Kong in the in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.


8. Czechoslovakia had signed and approved the Convention on 27 December 1973 and 4 September 1974, respectively, with a declaration. For the text of the declaration, see United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 988, p. 250. See also note 1 under "Czech Republic" and note 1 under "Slovakia" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.


9. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.


10. With the following declaration: "Accession to the Convention shall not extend to the Cook Islands, Niue and the Tokelau Islands".


11. Upon a request from the Secretary-General for clarification as to whether the declaration to article 25 was deemed to modify the legal effects of that article, the Government of Cuba replied that the declaration did not constitute a reservation.