Status- Table of contents Participants Notes Chapter XV Previous treaty Next treaty  

2. Protocol for extending the period of validity of the Convention on the Declaration of Death of Missing Persons

New York, 16 January 1957

 

Entry into force: 22 January 1957, in accordance with article III (a).
Registration: 1 January 1998, No. 1610.
Status: Parties: 6.
Text: United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 258, p. 392
TERMINATION: of the Convention of 6 April 1950 (see chapter XV.1). 
 

 

PARTICIPANTS


Participant  Accession (a) 
Cambodia  30 Jul 1957 a 
China1   
Germany2,3  23 Oct 1958 a 
Guatemala  8 Aug 1961 a 
Israel  22 Jan 1957 a 
Italy  25 Mar 1958 a 
Pakistan  21 Jan 1957 a 
 

 

NOTES


1. Accession on behalf of the Republic of China on 9 September 1957. See note concerning signatures, ratifications, accessions, etc., on behalf of China (note 1 under "China" in the "Historical Information" secton in the front matter of this volume).

In communications addressed to the Secretary-General with reference to the above-mentioned signature and/or ratification, the Permanent Missions to the United Nations of Czechoslovakia, Denmark, India, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Yugoslavia stated that, since their Governments did not recognize the Nationalist Chinese authorities as the Government of China, they could not regard the said signature or ratification as valid. The Permanent Missions of Czechoslovakia and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics further stated that the sole authorities entitled to act for China and the Chinese people in the United Nations and in international relations, and to sign, ratify, accede or denounce treaties, conventions and agreements on behalf of China, were the Government of the People's Republic of China and its duly appointed representatives.

In a note addressed to the Secretary-General, the Permanent Mission of China to the United Nations stated that the Government of the Republic of China was the only legal Government which represented China and the Chinese people in international relations and that, therefore, the allegations made in the above-mentioned communica tions as to the lack of validity of the signature or ratification in question had no legal foundation whatsoever.


2. See note 2 under "Germany" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.


3. See note 1 under "Germany" regarding Berlin (West) in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.