| Entry into force: | 30 July 1998, in accordance with article 2 of the Additional Protocol. |
| Registration: | 30 July 1998, No. 22495. |
| Status: | ,Parties: 87. |
| Text: | Doc. CCW/CONF.I/16 Part I). |
Note: At its 8th plenary meeting on 13 October 1995, the Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects adopted pursuant to article 8.3 (b) of the Convention an additional Protocol entitled "Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons (Protocol IV)".
|
|
| Participant | Consent to be bound (P), Succession (d) |
| Albania | 28 Aug 2002 P |
| Argentina | 21 Oct 1998 P |
| Australia | 22 Aug 1997 P |
| Austria | 27 Jul 1998 P |
| Bangladesh | 6 Sep 2000 P |
| Belarus | 13 Sep 2000 P |
| Belgium | 10 Mar 1999 P |
| Bolivia | 21 Sep 2001 P |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 11 Oct 2001 P |
| Brazil | 4 Oct 1999 P |
| Bulgaria | 3 Dec 1998 P |
| Burkina Faso | 26 Nov 2003 P |
| Cambodia | 25 Mar 1997 P |
| Cameroon | 7 Dec 2006 P |
| Canada | 5 Jan 1998 P |
| Cape Verde | 16 Sep 1997 P |
| Chile | 15 Oct 2003 P |
| China | 4 Nov 1998 P |
| Colombia | 6 Mar 2000 P |
| Costa Rica | 17 Dec 1998 P |
| Croatia | 25 Apr 2002 P |
| Cyprus | 22 Jul 2003 P |
| Czech Republic | 10 Aug 1998 P |
| Denmark | 30 Apr 1997 P |
| Ecuador | 16 Dec 2003 P |
| El Salvador | 26 Jan 2000 P |
| Estonia | 20 Apr 2000 P |
| Finland | 11 Jan 1996 P |
| France | 30 Jun 1998 P |
| Georgia | 14 Jul 2006 P |
| Germany | 27 Jun 1997 P |
| Greece | 5 Aug 1997 P |
| Guatemala | 30 Aug 2002 P |
| Holy See | 22 Jul 1997 P |
| Honduras | 30 Oct 2003 P |
| Hungary | 30 Jan 1998 P |
| India | 2 Sep 1999 P |
| Ireland | 27 Mar 1997 P |
| Israel | 30 Oct 2000 P |
| Italy | 13 Jan 1999 P |
| Japan | 10 Jun 1997 P |
| Latvia | 11 Mar 1998 P |
| Liberia | 16 Sep 2005 P |
| Liechtenstein | 19 Nov 1997 P |
| Lithuania | 3 Jun 1998 P |
| Luxembourg | 5 Aug 1999 P |
| Maldives | 7 Sep 2000 P |
| Mali | 24 Oct 2001 P |
| Malta | 24 Sep 2004 P |
| Mauritius | 24 Dec 2002 P |
| Mexico | 10 Mar 1998 P |
| Moldova | 8 Sep 2000 P |
| Mongolia | 6 Apr 1999 P |
| Montenegro1 | 23 Oct 2006 d |
| Morocco | 19 Mar 2002 P |
| Nauru | 12 Nov 2001 P |
| Netherlands2 | 25 Mar 1999 P |
| New Zealand | 8 Jan 1998 P |
| Nicaragua | 5 Dec 2000 P |
| Niger | 18 Sep 2007 P |
| Norway | 20 Apr 1998 P |
| Pakistan | 5 Dec 2000 P |
| Panama | 26 Mar 1997 P |
| Peru | 3 Jul 1997 P |
| Philippines | 12 Jun 1997 P |
| Poland | 23 Sep 2004 P |
| Portugal | 12 Nov 2001 P |
| Romania | 25 Aug 2003 P |
| Russian Federation | 9 Sep 1999 P |
| Serbia | 12 Aug 2003 P |
| Seychelles | 8 Jun 2000 P |
| Sierra Leone | 30 Sep 2004 P |
| Slovakia | 30 Nov 1999 P |
| Slovenia | 3 Dec 2002 P |
| South Africa | 26 Jun 1998 P |
| Spain | 19 Jan 1998 P |
| Sri Lanka | 24 Sep 2004 P |
| Sweden | 15 Jan 1997 P |
| Switzerland | 24 Mar 1998 P |
| Tajikistan | 12 Oct 1999 P |
| The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | 19 Mar 2007 P |
| Tunisia | 23 Mar 2006 P |
| Turkey | 2 Mar 2005 P |
| Ukraine | 28 May 2003 P |
| United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 11 Feb 1999 P |
| Uruguay | 18 Sep 1998 P |
| Uzbekistan | 29 Sep 1997 P |
|
|
Declaration:
"It is the understanding of the Government of Australia that the provisions of Protocol IV shall apply in all circumstances."
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declaration:
It is the understanding of the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium that the provisions of Protocol IV which by their contents or nature may also be applied in peacetime, shall be observed at all times.
19 October 1998
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declaration in relation to article 1:
"It is the understanding of Ireland that the provisions of the Additional Protocol which by their contents or nature may also be applied in peacetime, shall be observed at all times."
Declaration:
"With reference to the scope of application defined in Article 1 of the Convention, the Government of the State of Israel will apply the provisions of the Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons as well as the Convention and those annexed Protocols to which Israel has agreed to become bound, to all armed conflicts involving regular armed forces of States referred to in article 2 common to the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, as well as to all armed conflicts referred to in Article 3 common to the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949."
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declaration:
With regard to Article 1:
"The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands takes the view that the provisions of Protocol IV which, given their content or nature, can also be applied in peacetime must be observed in all circumstances."
Declaration:
The Republic of Poland believes that the provisions of the Additional Protocol should also be applied during peacetime.
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Ireland.]
Declarations:
"--Sweden intends to apply the Protocol to all types of armed conflict;
- -Sweden intends to pursue an international agreement by which the provisions of the Protocol shall be applicable to all types of armed conflict;
-- Sweden has since long strived for explicit prohibition of the use of blinding laser which would risk causing permanent blindness to soldiers. Such an effect, in Sweden's view is contrary to the principle of international law prohibiting means and methods of warfare which cause unnecessary suffering."
Declaration:
[Same declaration, mutatis mutandis, as the one made by Australia.]
Declaration:
''In relation to Protocol IV, the Government of the United Kingdom declare that their application of its provisions will not be limited to the situations set out in Article 1 of the [1980] Convention."
|
|
1. See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
3. In keeping with the depositary practice followed in similar cases, the Secretary-General proposed to receive the declaration for deposit in the absence of any objection on the part of the Contracting States, either to the deposit itself or to the procedure envisaged, within a period of 90 days from the date of its circulation (i.e. 21 July 1998). None of the Contracting Parties to the Protocol having notified the Secretary-General of an objection within the 90 days period, the declaration was deemed to have been accepted for deposit upon the expiration of the 90 day period in question, i.e. on 19 october 1998.