UNITED NATIONS
2000
PREAMBLE
The
States Parties to this Statute,
Conscious
that all peoples are united by common bonds, their cultures pieced together
in a shared heritage, and concerned that this delicate mosaic may be shattered
at any time,
Mindful
that during this century millions of children, women and men have been
victims of unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of
humanity,
Recognizing
that such grave crimes threaten the peace, security and well-being of the
world,
Affirming
that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community
as a whole must not go unpunished and that their effective prosecution
must be ensured by taking measures at the national level and by enhancing
international cooperation,
Determined
to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus
to contribute to the prevention of such crimes,
Recalling
that it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction
over those responsible for international crimes,
Reaffirming
the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and in
particular that all States shall refrain from the threat or use of force
against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State,
or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations,
Emphasizing
in this connection that nothing in this Statute shall be taken as authorizing
any State Party to intervene in an armed conflict or in the internal affairs
of any State,
Determined
to these ends and for the sake of present and future generations, to establish
an independent permanent International Criminal Court in relationship with
the United Nations system, with jurisdiction over the most serious crimes
of concern to the international community as a whole,
Emphasizing
that the International Criminal Court established under this Statute shall
be complementary to national criminal jurisdictions,
Resolved
to guarantee lasting respect for and the enforcement of international justice,
Have
agreed as follows:
PART 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COURT
Article 1
The Court
An International Criminal Court ("the Court") is hereby established. It
shall be a permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its
jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international
concern, as referred to in this Statute, and shall be complementary to
national criminal jurisdictions. The jurisdiction and functioning of the
Court shall be governed by the provisions of this Statute.
Article 2
Relationship of the Court with the United Nations
The Court shall be brought into relationship with the United Nations through
an agreement to be approved by the Assembly of States Parties to this Statute
and thereafter concluded by the President of the Court on its behalf.
Article 3
Seat of the Court
1. The
seat of the Court shall be established at The Hague in the Netherlands
("the host State").
2. The
Court shall enter into a headquarters agreement with the host State, to
be approved by the Assembly of States Parties and thereafter concluded
by the President of the Court on its behalf.
3. The
Court may sit elsewhere, whenever it considers it desirable, as provided
in this Statute.
Article 4
Legal status and powers of the Court
1. The
Court shall have international legal personality. It shall also have such
legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and
the fulfilment of its purposes.
2. The
Court may exercise its functions and powers, as provided in this Statute,
on the territory of any State Party and, by special agreement, on the territory
of any other State.
PART 2. JURISDICTION, ADMISSIBILITY AND APPLICABLE LAW
Article 5
Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
1. The
jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of
concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction
in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes:
(a) The crime of genocide;
(b) Crimes against humanity;
(c) War crimes;
(d) The crime of aggression.
2. The Court
shall exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression once a provision
is adopted in accordance with articles 121 and 123 defining the crime and
setting out the conditions under which the Court shall exercise jurisdiction
with respect to this crime. Such a provision shall be consistent with the
relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 6
Genocide
For the purpose of this Statute, "genocide" means any of the following
acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members
of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions
of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or
in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births
within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group
to another group.
Article 7
Crimes against humanity
1. For
the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the
following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack
directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
(a) Murder;
(b) Extermination;
(c) Enslavement;
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of
physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
(f) Torture;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution,
forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence
of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group
or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious,
gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally
recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with
any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction
of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character
intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to
mental or physical health.
2. For
the purpose of paragraph 1:
(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population"
means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred
to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance
of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;
(b) "Extermination" includes the intentional infliction
of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food
and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population;
(c) "Enslavement" means the exercise of any or
all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over a person and
includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in persons,
in particular women and children;
(d) "Deportation or forcible transfer of population"
means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other
coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without
grounds permitted under international law;
(e) "Torture" means the intentional infliction
of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person
in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture
shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental
to, lawful sanctions;
(f) "Forced pregnancy" means the unlawful confinement
of a woman forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic
composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of
international law. This definition shall not in any way be interpreted
as affecting national laws relating to pregnancy;
(g) "Persecution" means the intentional and severe
deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason
of the identity of the group or collectivity;
(h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts
of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in
the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and
domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and
committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;
(i) "Enforced disappearance of persons" means the
arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization,
support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed
by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information
on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing
them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.
3. For
the purpose of this Statute, it is understood that the term "gender" refers
to the two sexes, male and female, within the context of society. The term
"gender" does not indicate any meaning different from the above.
Article 8
War crimes
1. The
Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when
committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission
of such crimes.
2. For
the purpose of this Statute, "war crimes" means:
(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of
12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property
protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:
(i) Wilful killing;
(ii) Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological
experiments;
(iii) Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious
injury to body or health;
(iv) Extensive destruction and appropriation of
property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully
and wantonly;
(v) Compelling a prisoner of war or other protected
person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power;
(vi) Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other
protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial;
(vii) Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful
confinement;
(viii) Taking of hostages.
(b) Other serious violations of the laws and customs
applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework
of international law, namely, any of the following acts:
(i) Intentionally directing attacks against the
civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking
direct part in hostilities;
(ii) Intentionally directing attacks against civilian
objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;
(iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel,
installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance
or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,
as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian
objects under the international law of armed conflict;
(iv) Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge
that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians
or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage
to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation
to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;
(v) Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means,
towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which
are not military objectives;
(vi) Killing or wounding a combatant who, having
laid down his arms or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered
at discretion;
(vii) Making improper use of a flag of truce, of
the flag or of the military insignia and uniform of the enemy or of the
United Nations, as well as of the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions,
resulting in death or serious personal injury;
(viii) The transfer, directly or indirectly, by
the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory
it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population
of the occupied territory within or outside this territory;
(ix) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings
dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes,
historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are
collected, provided they are not military objectives;
(x) Subjecting persons who are in the power of
an adverse party to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific experiments
of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental or hospital
treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or her interest,
and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health of such person
or persons;
(xi) Killing or wounding treacherously individuals
belonging to the hostile nation or army;
(xii) Declaring that no quarter will be given;
(xiii) Destroying or seizing the enemy's property
unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities
of war;
(xiv) Declaring abolished, suspended or inadmissible
in a court of law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile
party;
(xv) Compelling the nationals of the hostile party
to take part in the operations of war directed against their own country,
even if they were in the belligerent's service before the commencement
of the war;
(xvi) Pillaging a town or place, even when taken
by assault;
(xvii) Employing poison or poisoned weapons;
(xviii) Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other
gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices;
(xix) Employing bullets which expand or flatten
easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does
not entirely cover the core or is pierced with incisions;
(xx) Employing weapons, projectiles and material
and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury
or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation
of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons,
projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive
prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment
in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and
123;
(xxi) Committing outrages upon personal dignity,
in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;
(xxii) Committing rape, sexual slavery, enforced
prostitution, forced pregnancy, as defined in article 7, paragraph 2 (f),
enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence also constituting
a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions;
(xxiii) Utilizing the presence of a civilian or
other protected person to render certain points, areas or military forces
immune from military operations;
(xxiv) Intentionally directing attacks against
buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the
distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international
law;
(xxv) Intentionally using starvation of civilians
as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their
survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under
the Geneva Conventions;
(xxvi) Conscripting or enlisting children under
the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to
participate actively in hostilities.
(c) In the case of an armed conflict not of an
international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the
four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following
acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities,
including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those
placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other
cause:
(i) Violence to life and person, in particular
murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
(ii) Committing outrages upon personal dignity,
in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;
(iii) Taking of hostages;
(iv) The passing of sentences and the carrying
out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly
constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally
recognized as indispensable.
(d) Paragraph 2 (c) applies to armed conflicts
not of an international character and thus does not apply to situations
of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic
acts of violence or other acts of a similar nature.
(e) Other serious violations of the laws and customs
applicable in armed conflicts not of an international character, within
the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following
acts:
(i) Intentionally directing attacks against the
civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking
direct part in hostilities;
(ii) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings,
material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive
emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law;
(iii) Intentionally directing attacks against personnel,
installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance
or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,
as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian
objects under the international law of armed conflict;
(iv) Intentionally directing attacks against buildings
dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes,
historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are
collected, provided they are not military objectives;
(v) Pillaging a town or place, even when taken
by assault;
(vi) Committing rape, sexual slavery, enforced
prostitution, forced pregnancy, as defined in article 7, paragraph 2 (f),
enforced sterilization, and any other form of sexual violence also constituting
a serious violation of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions;
(vii) Conscripting or enlisting children under
the age of fifteen years into armed forces or groups or using them to participate
actively in hostilities;
(viii) Ordering the displacement of the civilian
population for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of
the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand;
(ix) Killing or wounding treacherously a combatant
adversary;
(x) Declaring that no quarter will be given;
(xi) Subjecting persons who are in the power of
another party to the conflict to physical mutilation or to medical or scientific
experiments of any kind which are neither justified by the medical, dental
or hospital treatment of the person concerned nor carried out in his or
her interest, and which cause death to or seriously endanger the health
of such person or persons;
(xii) Destroying or seizing the property of an
adversary unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by
the necessities of the conflict;
(f) Paragraph 2 (e) applies to armed conflicts not of an international
character and thus does not apply to situations of internal disturbances
and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence or
other acts of a similar nature. It applies to armed conflicts that take
place in the territory of a State when there is protracted armed conflict
between governmental authorities and organized armed groups or between
such groups.
3. Nothing
in paragraph 2 (c) and (e) shall affect the responsibility of a Government
to maintain or re-establish law and order in the State or to defend the
unity and territorial integrity of the State, by all legitimate means.
Article 9
Elements of Crimes
1. Elements
of Crimes shall assist the Court in the interpretation and application
of articles 6, 7 and 8. They shall be adopted by a two-thirds majority
of the members of the Assembly of States Parties.
2. Amendments
to the Elements of Crimes may be proposed by:
(a) Any State Party;
(b) The judges acting by an absolute majority;
(c) The Prosecutor.
Such amendments shall be adopted by a two-thirds majority
of the members of the Assembly of States Parties.
3. The
Elements of Crimes and amendments thereto shall be consistent with this
Statute.
Article 10
Nothing in this Part shall be interpreted as limiting or prejudicing in
any way existing or developing rules of international law for purposes
other than this Statute.
Article 11
Jurisdiction ratione temporis
1. The
Court has jurisdiction only with respect to crimes committed after the
entry into force of this Statute.
2. If
a State becomes a Party to this Statute after its entry into force, the
Court may exercise its jurisdiction only with respect to crimes committed
after the entry into force of this Statute for that State, unless that
State has made a declaration under article 12, paragraph 3.
Article 12
Preconditions to the exercise of jurisdiction
1. A State
which becomes a Party to this Statute thereby accepts the jurisdiction
of the Court with respect to the crimes referred to in article 5.
2. In
the case of article 13, paragraph (a) or (c), the Court may exercise its
jurisdiction if one or more of the following States are Parties to this
Statute or have accepted the jurisdiction of the Court in accordance with
paragraph 3:
(a) The State on the territory of which the conduct
in question occurred or, if the crime was committed on board a vessel or
aircraft, the State of registration of that vessel or aircraft;
(b) The State of which the person accused of the
crime is a national.
3. If
the acceptance of a State which is not a Party to this Statute is required
under paragraph 2, that State may, by declaration lodged with the Registrar,
accept the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court with respect to the crime
in question. The accepting State shall cooperate with the Court without
any delay or exception in accordance with Part 9.
Article 13
Exercise of jurisdiction
The Court may exercise its jurisdiction with respect to a crime referred
to in article 5 in accordance with the provisions of this Statute if:
(a) A situation in which one or more of such crimes
appears to have been committed is referred to the Prosecutor by a State
Party in accordance with article 14;
(b) A situation in which one or more of such crimes
appears to have been committed is referred to the Prosecutor by the Security
Council acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations;
or
(c) The Prosecutor has initiated an investigation
in respect of such a crime in accordance with article 15.
Article 14
Referral of a situation by a State Party
1. A State
Party may refer to the Prosecutor a situation in which one or more crimes
within the jurisdiction of the Court appear to have been committed requesting
the Prosecutor to investigate the situation for the purpose of determining
whether one or more specific persons should be charged with the commission
of such crimes.
2. As
far as possible, a referral shall specify the relevant circumstances and
be accompanied by such supporting documentation as is available to the
State referring the situation.
Article 15
Prosecutor
1. The
Prosecutor may initiate investigations proprio motu on the basis
of information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.
2. The
Prosecutor shall analyse the seriousness of the information received. For
this purpose, he or she may seek additional information from States, organs
of the United Nations, intergovernmental or non-governmental organizations,
or other reliable sources that he or she deems appropriate, and may receive
written or oral testimony at the seat of the Court.
3. If
the Prosecutor concludes that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with
an investigation, he or she shall submit to the Pre-Trial Chamber a request
for authorization of an investigation, together with any supporting material
collected. Victims may make representations to the Pre-Trial Chamber, in
accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
4. If
the Pre-Trial Chamber, upon examination of the request and the supporting
material, considers that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an
investigation, and that the case appears to fall within the jurisdiction
of the Court, it shall authorize the commencement of the investigation,
without prejudice to subsequent determinations by the Court with regard
to the jurisdiction and admissibility of a case.
5. The
refusal of the Pre-Trial Chamber to authorize the investigation shall not
preclude the presentation of a subsequent request by the Prosecutor based
on new facts or evidence regarding the same situation.
6. If,
after the preliminary examination referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the
Prosecutor concludes that the information provided does not constitute
a reasonable basis for an investigation, he or she shall inform those who
provided the information. This shall not preclude the Prosecutor from considering
further information submitted to him or her regarding the same situation
in the light of new facts or evidence.
Article 16
Deferral of investigation or prosecution
No investigation or prosecution may be commenced or proceeded with under
this Statute for a period of 12 months after the Security Council, in a
resolution adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,
has requested the Court to that effect; that request may be renewed by
the Council under the same conditions.
Article 17
Issues of admissibility
1. Having
regard to paragraph 10 of the Preamble and article 1, the Court shall determine
that a case is inadmissible where:
(a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted
by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling
or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution;
(b) The case has been investigated by a State which
has jurisdiction over it and the State has decided not to prosecute the
person concerned, unless the decision resulted from the unwillingness or
inability of the State genuinely to prosecute;
(c) The person concerned has already been tried
for conduct which is the subject of the complaint, and a trial by the Court
is not permitted under article 20, paragraph 3;
(d) The case is not of sufficient gravity to justify
further action by the Court.
2. In
order to determine unwillingness in a particular case, the Court shall
consider, having regard to the principles of due process recognized by
international law, whether one or more of the following exist, as applicable:
(a) The proceedings were or are being undertaken
or the national decision was made for the purpose of shielding the person
concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction
of the Court referred to in article 5;
(b) There has been an unjustified delay in the
proceedings which in the circumstances is inconsistent with an intent to
bring the person concerned to justice;
(c) The proceedings were not or are not being conducted
independently or impartially, and they were or are being conducted in a
manner which, in the circumstances, is inconsistent with an intent to bring
the person concerned to justice.
3. In
order to determine inability in a particular case, the Court shall consider
whether, due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its
national judicial system, the State is unable to obtain the accused or
the necessary evidence and testimony or otherwise unable to carry out its
proceedings.
Article 18
Preliminary rulings regarding admissibility
1. When
a situation has been referred to the Court pursuant to article 13 (a) and
the Prosecutor has determined that there would be a reasonable basis to
commence an investigation, or the Prosecutor initiates an investigation
pursuant to articles 13 (c) and 15, the Prosecutor shall notify all States
Parties and those States which, taking into account the information available,
would normally exercise jurisdiction over the crimes concerned. The Prosecutor
may notify such States on a confidential basis and, where the Prosecutor
believes it necessary to protect persons, prevent destruction of evidence
or prevent the absconding of persons, may limit the scope of the information
provided to States.
2. Within
one month of receipt of that notification, a State may inform the Court
that it is investigating or has investigated its nationals or others within
its jurisdiction with respect to criminal acts which may constitute crimes
referred to in article 5 and which relate to the information provided in
the notification to States. At the request of that State, the Prosecutor
shall defer to the State's investigation of those persons unless the Pre-Trial
Chamber, on the application of the Prosecutor, decides to authorize the
investigation.
3. The
Prosecutor's deferral to a State's investigation shall be open to review
by the Prosecutor six months after the date of deferral or at any time
when there has been a significant change of circumstances based on the
State's unwillingness or inability genuinely to carry out the investigation.
4. The
State concerned or the Prosecutor may appeal to the Appeals Chamber against
a ruling of the Pre-Trial Chamber, in accordance with article 82. The appeal
may be heard on an expedited basis.
5. When
the Prosecutor has deferred an investigation in accordance with paragraph
2, the Prosecutor may request that the State concerned periodically inform
the Prosecutor of the progress of its investigations and any subsequent
prosecutions. States Parties shall respond to such requests without undue
delay.
6. Pending
a ruling by the Pre-Trial Chamber, or at any time when the Prosecutor has
deferred an investigation under this article, the Prosecutor may, on an
exceptional basis, seek authority from the Pre-Trial Chamber to pursue
necessary investigative steps for the purpose of preserving evidence where
there is a unique opportunity to obtain important evidence or there is
a significant risk that such evidence may not be subsequently available.
7. A State
which has challenged a ruling of the Pre-Trial Chamber under this article
may challenge the admissibility of a case under article 19 on the grounds
of additional significant facts or significant change of circumstances.
Article 19
Challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court
or the admissibility of a case
1. The
Court shall satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction in any case brought
before it. The Court may, on its own motion, determine the admissibility
of a case in accordance with article 17.
2. Challenges
to the admissibility of a case on the grounds referred to in article 17
or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court may be made by:
(a) An accused or a person for whom a warrant of arrest
or a summons to appear has been issued under article 58;
(b) A State which has jurisdiction over a case,
on the ground that it is investigating or prosecuting the case or has investigated
or prosecuted; or
(c) A State from which acceptance of jurisdiction
is required under article 12.
3. The
Prosecutor may seek a ruling from the Court regarding a question of jurisdiction
or admissibility. In proceedings with respect to jurisdiction or admissibility,
those who have referred the situation under article 13, as well as victims,
may also submit observations to the Court.
4. The
admissibility of a case or the jurisdiction of the Court may be challenged
only once by any person or State referred to in paragraph 2. The challenge
shall take place prior to or at the commencement of the trial. In exceptional
circumstances, the Court may grant leave for a challenge to be brought
more than once or at a time later than the commencement of the trial. Challenges
to the admissibility of a case, at the commencement of a trial, or subsequently
with the leave of the Court, may be based only on article 17, paragraph
1 (c).
5. A State
referred to in paragraph 2 (b) and (c) shall make a challenge at the earliest
opportunity.
6. Prior
to the confirmation of the charges, challenges to the admissibility of
a case or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court shall be referred
to the Pre-Trial Chamber. After confirmation of the charges, they shall
be referred to the Trial Chamber. Decisions with respect to jurisdiction
or admissibility may be appealed to the Appeals Chamber in accordance with
article 82.
7. If
a challenge is made by a State referred to in paragraph 2 (b) or (c), the
Prosecutor shall suspend the investigation until such time as the Court
makes a determination in accordance with article 17.
8. Pending
a ruling by the Court, the Prosecutor may seek authority from the Court:
(a) To pursue necessary investigative steps of
the kind referred to in article 18, paragraph 6;
(b) To take a statement or testimony from a witness
or complete the collection and examination of evidence which had begun
prior to the making of the challenge; and
(c) In cooperation with the relevant States, to
prevent the absconding of persons in respect of whom the Prosecutor has
already requested a warrant of arrest under article 58.
9. The
making of a challenge shall not affect the validity of any act performed
by the Prosecutor or any order or warrant issued by the Court prior to
the making of the challenge.
10. If
the Court has decided that a case is inadmissible under article 17, the
Prosecutor may submit a request for a review of the decision when he or
she is fully satisfied that new facts have arisen which negate the basis
on which the case had previously been found inadmissible under article
17.
11. If
the Prosecutor, having regard to the matters referred to in article 17,
defers an investigation, the Prosecutor may request that the relevant State
make available to the Prosecutor information on the proceedings. That information
shall, at the request of the State concerned, be confidential. If the Prosecutor
thereafter decides to proceed with an investigation, he or she shall notify
the State to which deferral of the proceedings has taken place.
Article 20
Ne bis in idem
1. Except
as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court
with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the
person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
2. No
person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article
5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the
Court.
3. No
person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed
under article 6, 7 or 8 shall be tried by the Court with respect to the
same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court:
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person
concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction
of the Court; or
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently
or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by
international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances,
was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.
Article 21
Applicable law
1. The
Court shall apply:
(a) In the first place, this Statute, Elements
of Crimes and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence;
(b) In the second place, where appropriate, applicable
treaties and the principles and rules of international law, including the
established principles of the international law of armed conflict;
(c) Failing that, general principles of law derived
by the Court from national laws of legal systems of the world including,
as appropriate, the national laws of States that would normally exercise
jurisdiction over the crime, provided that those principles are not inconsistent
with this Statute and with international law and internationally recognized
norms and standards.
2. The
Court may apply principles and rules of law as interpreted in its previous
decisions.
3. The
application and interpretation of law pursuant to this article must be
consistent with internationally recognized human rights, and be without
any adverse distinction founded on grounds such as gender as defined in
article 7, paragraph 3, age, race, colour, language, religion or belief,
political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth,
birth or other status.
PART 3. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW
Article 22
Nullum crimen sine lege
1. A person
shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct
in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the
jurisdiction of the Court.
2. The
definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended
by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in
favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.
3. This
article shall not affect the characterization of any conduct as criminal
under international law independently of this Statute.
Article 23
Nulla poena sine lege
A person convicted by the Court may be punished only in accordance with
this Statute.
Article 24
Non-retroactivity ratione personae
1. No
person shall be criminally responsible under this Statute for conduct prior
to the entry into force of the Statute.
2. In
the event of a change in the law applicable to a given case prior to a
final judgement, the law more favourable to the person being investigated,
prosecuted or convicted shall apply.
Article 25
Individual criminal responsibility
1. The
Court shall have jurisdiction over natural persons pursuant to this Statute.
2. A person
who commits a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court shall be individually
responsible and liable for punishment in accordance with this Statute.
3. In
accordance with this Statute, a person shall be criminally responsible
and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court
if that person:
(a)
Commits such a crime, whether as an individual, jointly with another or
through another person, regardless of whether that other person is criminally
responsible;
(b)
Orders, solicits or induces the commission of such a crime which in fact
occurs or is attempted;
(c)
For the purpose of facilitating the commission of such a crime, aids, abets
or otherwise assists in its commission or its attempted commission, including
providing the means for its commission;
(d)
In any other way contributes to the commission or attempted commission
of such a crime by a group of persons acting with a common purpose. Such
contribution shall be intentional and shall either:
(i)
Be made with the aim of furthering the criminal activity or criminal purpose
of the group, where such activity or purpose involves the commission of
a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(ii)
Be made in the knowledge of the intention of the group to commit the crime;
(e)
In respect of the crime of genocide, directly and publicly incites others
to commit genocide;
(f)
Attempts to commit such a crime by taking action that commences its execution
by means of a substantial step, but the crime does not occur because of
circumstances independent of the person's intentions. However, a person
who abandons the effort to commit the crime or otherwise prevents the completion
of the crime shall not be liable for punishment under this Statute for
the attempt to commit that crime if that person completely and voluntarily
gave up the criminal purpose.
4. No
provision in this Statute relating to individual criminal responsibility
shall affect the responsibility of States under international law.
Article 26
Exclusion of jurisdiction over persons under eighteen
The Court shall have no jurisdiction over any person who was under the
age of 18 at the time of the alleged commission of a crime.
Article 27
Irrelevance of official capacity
1. This
Statute shall apply equally to all persons without any distinction based
on official capacity. In particular, official capacity as a Head of State
or Government, a member of a Government or parliament, an elected representative
or a government official shall in no case exempt a person from criminal
responsibility under this Statute, nor shall it, in and of itself, constitute
a ground for reduction of sentence.
2. Immunities
or special procedural rules which may attach to the official capacity of
a person, whether under national or international law, shall not bar the
Court from exercising its jurisdiction over such a person.
Article 28
Responsibility of commanders and other superiors
In addition to other grounds of criminal responsibility under this Statute
for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court:
(a) A military commander or person effectively
acting as a military commander shall be criminally responsible for crimes
within the jurisdiction of the Court committed by forces under his or her
effective command and control, or effective authority and control as the
case may be, as a result of his or her failure to exercise control properly
over such forces, where:
(i) That military commander or person either knew
or, owing to the circumstances at the time, should have known that the
forces were committing or about to commit such crimes; and
(ii) That military commander or person failed to
take all necessary and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent
or repress their commission or to submit the matter to the competent authorities
for investigation and prosecution.
(b) With respect to superior and subordinate relationships
not described in paragraph (a), a superior shall be criminally responsible
for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court committed by subordinates
under his or her effective authority and control, as a result of his or
her failure to exercise control properly over such subordinates, where:
(i) The superior either knew, or consciously disregarded
information which clearly indicated, that the subordinates were committing
or about to commit such crimes;
(ii) The crimes concerned activities that were
within the effective responsibility and control of the superior; and
(iii) The superior failed to take all necessary
and reasonable measures within his or her power to prevent or repress their
commission or to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation
and prosecution.
Article 29
Non-applicability of statute of limitations
The crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court shall not be subject to
any statute of limitations.
Article 30
Mental element
1. Unless
otherwise provided, a person shall be criminally responsible and liable
for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court only if
the material elements are committed with intent and knowledge.
2. For
the purposes of this article, a person has intent where:
(a) In relation to conduct, that person means to
engage in the conduct;
(b) In relation to a consequence, that person means
to cause that consequence or is aware that it will occur in the ordinary
course of events.
3. For
the purposes of this article, "knowledge" means awareness that a circumstance
exists or a consequence will occur in the ordinary course of events. "Know"
and "knowingly" shall be construed accordingly.
Article 31
Grounds for excluding criminal responsibility
1. In
addition to other grounds for excluding criminal responsibility provided
for in this Statute, a person shall not be criminally responsible if, at
the time of that person's conduct:
(a) The person suffers from a mental disease or
defect that destroys that person's capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness
or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct
to conform to the requirements of law;
(b) The person is in a state of intoxication that
destroys that person's capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature
of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform
to the requirements of law, unless the person has become voluntarily intoxicated
under such circumstances that the person knew, or disregarded the risk,
that, as a result of the intoxication, he or she was likely to engage in
conduct constituting a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(c) The person acts reasonably to defend himself
or herself or another person or, in the case of war crimes, property which
is essential for the survival of the person or another person or property
which is essential for accomplishing a military mission, against an imminent
and unlawful use of force in a manner proportionate to the degree of danger
to the person or the other person or property protected. The fact that
the person was involved in a defensive operation conducted by forces shall
not in itself constitute a ground for excluding criminal responsibility
under this subparagraph;
(d) The conduct which is alleged to constitute
a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been caused by duress
resulting from a threat of imminent death or of continuing or imminent
serious bodily harm against that person or another person, and the person
acts necessarily and reasonably to avoid this threat, provided that the
person does not intend to cause a greater harm than the one sought to be
avoided. Such a threat may either be:
(i) Made by other persons; or
(ii) Constituted by other circumstances beyond
that person's control.
2. The
Court shall determine the applicability of the grounds for excluding criminal
responsibility provided for in this Statute to the case before it.
3. At
trial, the Court may consider a ground for excluding criminal responsibility
other than those referred to in paragraph 1 where such a ground is derived
from applicable law as set forth in article 21. The procedures relating
to the consideration of such a ground shall be provided for in the Rules
of Procedure and Evidence.
Article 32
Mistake of fact or mistake of law
1. A mistake
of fact shall be a ground for excluding criminal responsibility only if
it negates the mental element required by the crime.
2. A mistake
of law as to whether a particular type of conduct is a crime within the
jurisdiction of the Court shall not be a ground for excluding criminal
responsibility. A mistake of law may, however, be a ground for excluding
criminal responsibility if it negates the mental element required by such
a crime, or as provided for in article 33.
Article 33
Superior orders and prescription of law
1. The
fact that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed
by a person pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior, whether
military or civilian, shall not relieve that person of criminal responsibility
unless:
(a) The person was under a legal obligation to
obey orders of the Government or the superior in question;
(b) The person did not know that the order was
unlawful; and
(c) The order was not manifestly unlawful.
2. For
the purposes of this article, orders to commit genocide or crimes against
humanity are manifestly unlawful.
PART 4. COMPOSITION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT
Article 34
Organs of the Court
The Court shall be composed of the following organs:
(a) The Presidency;
(b) An Appeals Division, a Trial Division and a
Pre-Trial Division;
(c) The Office of the Prosecutor;
(d) The Registry.
Article 35
Service of judges
1. All
judges shall be elected as full-time members of the Court and shall be
available to serve on that basis from the commencement of their terms of
office.
2. The
judges composing the Presidency shall serve on a full-time basis as soon
as they are elected.
3. The
Presidency may, on the basis of the workload of the Court and in consultation
with its members, decide from time to time to what extent the remaining
judges shall be required to serve on a full-time basis. Any such arrangement
shall be without prejudice to the provisions of article 40.
4. The
financial arrangements for judges not required to serve on a full-time
basis shall be made in accordance with article 49.
Article 36
Qualifications, nomination and election of judges
1. Subject
to the provisions of paragraph 2, there shall be 18 judges of the Court.
2. (a)
The Presidency, acting on behalf of the Court, may propose an increase
in the number of judges specified in paragraph 1, indicating the reasons
why this is considered necessary and appropriate. The Registrar shall promptly
circulate any such proposal to all States Parties.
(b) Any such proposal shall then be considered
at a meeting of the Assembly of States Parties to be convened in accordance
with article 112. The proposal shall be considered adopted if approved
at the meeting by a vote of two thirds of the members of the Assembly of
States Parties and shall enter into force at such time as decided by the
Assembly of States Parties.
(c) (i) Once a proposal
for an increase in the number of judges has been adopted under subparagraph
(b), the election of the additional judges shall take place at the next
session of the Assembly of States Parties in accordance with paragraphs
3 to 8, and article 37, paragraph 2;
(ii) Once a proposal for an increase in the number
of judges has been adopted and brought into effect under subparagraphs
(b) and (c) (i), it shall be open to the Presidency at any time thereafter,
if the workload of the Court justifies it, to propose a reduction in the
number of judges, provided that the number of judges shall not be reduced
below that specified in paragraph 1. The proposal shall be dealt with in
accordance with the procedure laid down in subparagraphs (a) and (b). In
the event that the proposal is adopted, the number of judges shall be progressively
decreased as the terms of office of serving judges expire, until the necessary
number has been reached.
3. (a)
The judges shall be chosen from among persons of high moral character,
impartiality and integrity who possess the qualifications required in their
respective States for appointment to the highest judicial offices.
(b) Every candidate for election to the Court shall:
(i) Have established competence in criminal law
and procedure, and the necessary relevant experience, whether as judge,
prosecutor, advocate or in other similar capacity, in criminal proceedings;
or
(ii) Have established competence in relevant areas
of international law such as international humanitarian law and the law
of human rights, and extensive experience in a professional legal capacity
which is of relevance to the judicial work of the Court;
(c) Every candidate for election to the Court shall
have an excellent knowledge of and be fluent in at least one of the working
languages of the Court.
4. (a)
Nominations of candidates for election to the Court may be made by any
State Party to this Statute, and shall be made either:
(i) By the procedure for the nomination of candidates
for appointment to the highest judicial offices in the State in question;
or
(ii) By the procedure provided for the nomination
of candidates for the International Court of Justice in the Statute of
that Court.
Nominations shall be accompanied by a statement in the necessary detail
specifying how the candidate fulfils the requirements of paragraph 3.
(b) Each State Party may put forward one candidate
for any given election who need not necessarily be a national of that State
Party but shall in any case be a national of a State Party.
(c) The Assembly of States Parties may decide to
establish, if appropriate, an Advisory Committee on nominations. In that
event, the Committee's composition and mandate shall be established by
the Assembly of States Parties.
5. For
the purposes of the election, there shall be two lists of candidates:
List A containing
the names of candidates with the qualifications specified in paragraph
3 (b) (i); and
List B containing
the names of candidates with the qualifications specified in paragraph
3 (b) (ii).
A candidate
with sufficient qualifications for both lists may choose on which list
to appear. At the first election to the Court, at least nine judges shall
be elected from list A and at least five judges from list B. Subsequent
elections shall be so organized as to maintain the equivalent proportion
on the Court of judges qualified on the two lists.
6. (a)
The judges shall be elected by secret ballot at a meeting of the Assembly
of States Parties convened for that purpose under article 112. Subject
to paragraph 7, the persons elected to the Court shall be the 18 candidates
who obtain the highest number of votes and a two-thirds majority of the
States Parties present and voting.
(b) In the event that a sufficient number of judges
is not elected on the first ballot, successive ballots shall be held in
accordance with the procedures laid down in subparagraph (a) until the
remaining places have been filled.
7. No
two judges may be nationals of the same State. A person who, for the purposes
of membership of the Court, could be regarded as a national of more than
one State shall be deemed to be a national of the State in which that person
ordinarily exercises civil and political rights.
8. (a)
The States Parties shall, in the selection of judges, take into account
the need, within the membership of the Court, for:
(i) The representation of the principal legal systems
of the world;
(ii) Equitable geographical representation; and
(iii) A fair representation of female and male
judges.
(b) States Parties shall also take into account
the need to include judges with legal expertise on specific issues, including,
but not limited to, violence against women or children.
9. (a)
Subject to subparagraph (b), judges shall hold office for a term of nine
years and, subject to subparagraph (c) and to article 37, paragraph 2,
shall not be eligible for re-election.
(b) At the first election, one third of the judges
elected shall be selected by lot to serve for a term of three years; one
third of the judges elected shall be selected by lot to serve for a term
of six years; and the remainder shall serve for a term of nine years.
(c) A judge who is selected to serve for a term
of three years under subparagraph (b) shall be eligible for re-election
for a full term.
10. Notwithstanding
paragraph 9, a judge assigned to a Trial or Appeals Chamber in accordance
with article 39 shall continue in office to complete any trial or appeal
the hearing of which has already commenced before that Chamber.
Article 37
Judicial vacancies
1. In
the event of a vacancy, an election shall be held in accordance with article
36 to fill the vacancy.
2. A judge
elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the predecessor's
term and, if that period is three years or less, shall be eligible for
re-election for a full term under article 36.
Article 38
The Presidency
1. The
President and the First and Second Vice-Presidents shall be elected by
an absolute majority of the judges. They shall each serve for a term of
three years or until the end of their respective terms of office as judges,
whichever expires earlier. They shall be eligible for re-election once.
2. The
First Vice-President shall act in place of the President in the event that
the President is unavailable or disqualified. The Second Vice-President
shall act in place of the President in the event that both the President
and the First Vice-President are unavailable or disqualified.
3. The
President, together with the First and Second Vice-Presidents, shall constitute
the Presidency, which shall be responsible for:
(a) The proper administration of the Court, with
the exception of the Office of the Prosecutor; and
(b) The other functions conferred upon it in accordance
with this Statute.
4. In
discharging its responsibility under paragraph 3 (a), the Presidency shall
coordinate with and seek the concurrence of the Prosecutor on all matters
of mutual concern.
Article 39
Chambers
1. As
soon as possible after the election of the judges, the Court shall organize
itself into the divisions specified in article 34, paragraph (b). The Appeals
Division shall be composed of the President and four other judges, the
Trial Division of not less than six judges and the Pre-Trial Division of
not less than six judges. The assignment of judges to divisions shall be
based on the nature of the functions to be performed by each division and
the qualifications and experience of the judges elected to the Court, in
such a way that each division shall contain an appropriate combination
of expertise in criminal law and procedure and in international law. The
Trial and Pre-Trial Divisions shall be composed predominantly of judges
with criminal trial experience.
2. (a)
The judicial functions of the Court shall be carried out in each division
by Chambers.
(b) (i) The Appeals Chamber
shall be composed of all the judges of the Appeals Division;
(ii) The functions of the Trial Chamber shall be
carried out by three judges of the Trial Division;
(iii) The functions of the Pre-Trial Chamber shall
be carried out either by three judges of the Pre-Trial Division or by a
single judge of that division in accordance with this Statute and the Rules
of Procedure and Evidence;
(c) Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the
simultaneous constitution of more than one Trial Chamber or Pre-Trial Chamber
when the efficient management of the Court's workload so requires.
3. (a)
Judges assigned to the Trial and Pre-Trial Divisions shall serve in those
divisions for a period of three years, and thereafter until the completion
of any case the hearing of which has already commenced in the division
concerned.
(b) Judges assigned to the Appeals Division shall
serve in that division for their entire term of office.
4. Judges
assigned to the Appeals Division shall serve only in that division. Nothing
in this article shall, however, preclude the temporary attachment of judges
from the Trial Division to the Pre-Trial Division or vice versa, if the
Presidency considers that the efficient management of the Court's workload
so requires, provided that under no circumstances shall a judge who has
participated in the pre-trial phase of a case be eligible to sit on the
Trial Chamber hearing that case.
Article 40
Independence of the judges
1. The
judges shall be independent in the performance of their functions.
2. Judges
shall not engage in any activity which is likely to interfere with their
judicial functions or to affect confidence in their independence.
3. Judges
required to serve on a full-time basis at the seat of the Court shall not
engage in any other occupation of a professional nature.
4. Any
question regarding the application of paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be decided
by an absolute majority of the judges. Where any such question concerns
an individual judge, that judge shall not take part in the decision.
Article 41
Excusing and disqualification of judges
1. The
Presidency may, at the request of a judge, excuse that judge from the exercise
of a function under this Statute, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure
and Evidence.
2. (a)
A judge shall not participate in any case in which his or her impartiality
might reasonably be doubted on any ground. A judge shall be disqualified
from a case in accordance with this paragraph if, inter alia, that
judge has previously been involved in any capacity in that case before
the Court or in a related criminal case at the national level involving
the person being investigated or prosecuted. A judge shall also be disqualified
on such other grounds as may be provided for in the Rules of Procedure
and Evidence.
(b)
The Prosecutor or the person being investigated or prosecuted may request
the disqualification of a judge under this paragraph.
(c)
Any question as to the disqualification of a judge shall be decided by
an absolute majority of the judges. The challenged judge shall be entitled
to present his or her comments on the matter, but shall not take part in
the decision.
Article 42
The Office of the Prosecutor
1. The
Office of the Prosecutor shall act independently as a separate organ of
the Court. It shall be responsible for receiving referrals and any substantiated
information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court, for examining
them and for conducting investigations and prosecutions before the Court.
A member of the Office shall not seek or act on instructions from any external
source.
2. The
Office shall be headed by the Prosecutor. The Prosecutor shall have full
authority over the management and administration of the Office, including
the staff, facilities and other resources thereof. The Prosecutor shall
be assisted by one or more Deputy Prosecutors, who shall be entitled to
carry out any of the acts required of the Prosecutor under this Statute.
The Prosecutor and the Deputy Prosecutors shall be of different nationalities.
They shall serve on a full-time basis.
3. The
Prosecutor and the Deputy Prosecutors shall be persons of high moral character,
be highly competent in and have extensive practical experience in the prosecution
or trial of criminal cases. They shall have an excellent knowledge of and
be fluent in at least one of the working languages of the Court.
4. The
Prosecutor shall be elected by secret ballot by an absolute majority of
the members of the Assembly of States Parties. The Deputy Prosecutors shall
be elected in the same way from a list of candidates provided by the Prosecutor.
The Prosecutor shall nominate three candidates for each position of Deputy
Prosecutor to be filled. Unless a shorter term is decided upon at the time
of their election, the Prosecutor and the Deputy Prosecutors shall hold
office for a term of nine years and shall not be eligible for re-election.
5. Neither
the Prosecutor nor a Deputy Prosecutor shall engage in any activity which
is likely to interfere with his or her prosecutorial functions or to affect
confidence in his or her independence. They shall not engage in any other
occupation of a professional nature.
6. The
Presidency may excuse the Prosecutor or a Deputy Prosecutor, at his or
her request, from acting in a particular case.
7. Neither
the Prosecutor nor a Deputy Prosecutor shall participate in any matter
in which their impartiality might reasonably be doubted on any ground.
They shall be disqualified from a case in accordance with this paragraph
if,
inter alia, they have previously been involved in any capacity
in that case before the Court or in a related criminal case at the national
level involving the person being investigated or prosecuted.
8. Any
question as to the disqualification of the Prosecutor or a Deputy Prosecutor
shall be decided by the Appeals Chamber.
(a) The person being investigated or prosecuted
may at any time request the disqualification of the Prosecutor or a Deputy
Prosecutor on the grounds set out in this article;
(b) The Prosecutor or the Deputy Prosecutor, as
appropriate, shall be entitled to present his or her comments on the matter;
9. The
Prosecutor shall appoint advisers with legal expertise on specific issues,
including, but not limited to, sexual and gender violence and violence
against children.
Article 43
The Registry
1. The
Registry shall be responsible for the non-judicial aspects of the administration
and servicing of the Court, without prejudice to the functions and powers
of the Prosecutor in accordance with article 42.
2. The
Registry shall be headed by the Registrar, who shall be the principal administrative
officer of the Court. The Registrar shall exercise his or her functions
under the authority of the President of the Court.
3. The
Registrar and the Deputy Registrar shall be persons of high moral character,
be highly competent and have an excellent knowledge of and be fluent in
at least one of the working languages of the Court.
4. The
judges shall elect the Registrar by an absolute majority by secret ballot,
taking into account any recommendation by the Assembly of States Parties.
If the need arises and upon the recommendation of the Registrar, the judges
shall elect, in the same manner, a Deputy Registrar.
5. The
Registrar shall hold office for a term of five years, shall be eligible
for re-election once and shall serve on a full-time basis. The Deputy Registrar
shall hold office for a term of five years or such shorter term as may
be decided upon by an absolute majority of the judges, and may be elected
on the basis that the Deputy Registrar shall be called upon to serve as
required.
6. The
Registrar shall set up a Victims and Witnesses Unit within the Registry.
This Unit shall provide, in consultation with the Office of the Prosecutor,
protective measures and security arrangements, counselling and other appropriate
assistance for witnesses, victims who appear before the Court, and others
who are at risk on account of testimony given by such witnesses. The Unit
shall include staff with expertise in trauma, including trauma related
to crimes of sexual violence.
Article 44
Staff
1. The
Prosecutor and the Registrar shall appoint such qualified staff as may
be required to their respective offices. In the case of the Prosecutor,
this shall include the appointment of investigators.
2. In
the employment of staff, the Prosecutor and the Registrar shall ensure
the highest standards of efficiency, competency and integrity, and shall
have regard, mutatis mutandis, to the criteria set forth in article
36, paragraph 8.
3. The
Registrar, with the agreement of the Presidency and the Prosecutor, shall
propose Staff Regulations which include the terms and conditions upon which
the staff of the Court shall be appointed, remunerated and dismissed. The
Staff Regulations shall be approved by the Assembly of States Parties.
4. The
Court may, in exceptional circumstances, employ the expertise of gratis
personnel offered by States Parties, intergovernmental organizations or
non-governmental organizations to assist with the work of any of the organs
of the Court. The Prosecutor may accept any such offer on behalf of the
Office of the Prosecutor. Such gratis personnel shall be employed in accordance
with guidelines to be established by the Assembly of States Parties.
Article 45
Solemn undertaking
Before taking up their respective duties under this Statute, the judges,
the Prosecutor, the Deputy Prosecutors, the Registrar and the Deputy Registrar
shall each make a solemn undertaking in open court to exercise his or her
respective functions impartially and conscientiously.
Article 46
Removal from office
1. A judge,
the Prosecutor, a Deputy Prosecutor, the Registrar or the Deputy Registrar
shall be removed from office if a decision to this effect is made in accordance
with paragraph 2, in cases where that person:
(a) Is found to have committed serious misconduct
or a serious breach of his or her duties under this Statute, as provided
for in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence; or
(b) Is unable to exercise the functions required
by this Statute.
2. A decision
as to the removal from office of a judge, the Prosecutor or a Deputy Prosecutor
under paragraph 1 shall be made by the Assembly of States Parties, by secret
ballot:
( a) In the case of a judge, by a two-thirds majority
of the States Parties upon a recommendation adopted by a two-thirds majority
of the other judges;
(b) In the case of the Prosecutor, by an absolute
majority of the States Parties;
(c) In the case of a Deputy Prosecutor, by an absolute
majority of the States Parties upon the recommendation of the Prosecutor.
3. A decision
as to the removal from office of the Registrar or Deputy Registrar shall
be made by an absolute majority of the judges.
4. A judge,
Prosecutor, Deputy Prosecutor, Registrar or Deputy Registrar whose conduct
or ability to exercise the functions of the office as required by this
Statute is challenged under this article shall have full opportunity to
present and receive evidence and to make submissions in accordance with
the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. The person in question shall not otherwise
participate in the consideration of the matter.
Article 47
Disciplinary measures
A judge, Prosecutor, Deputy Prosecutor, Registrar or Deputy Registrar who
has committed misconduct of a less serious nature than that set out in
article 46, paragraph 1, shall be subject to disciplinary measures, in
accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
Article 48
Privileges and immunities
1. The
Court shall enjoy in the territory of each State Party such privileges
and immunities as are necessary for the fulfilment of its purposes.
2. The
judges, the Prosecutor, the Deputy Prosecutors and the Registrar shall,
when engaged on or with respect to the business of the Court, enjoy the
same privileges and immunities as are accorded to heads of diplomatic missions
and shall, after the expiry of their terms of office, continue to be accorded
immunity from legal process of every kind in respect of words spoken or
written and acts performed by them in their official capacity.
3. The
Deputy Registrar, the staff of the Office of the Prosecutor and the staff
of the Registry shall enjoy the privileges and immunities and facilities
necessary for the performance of their functions, in accordance with the
agreement on the privileges and immunities of the Court.
4. Counsel,
experts, witnesses or any other person required to be present at the seat
of the Court shall be accorded such treatment as is necessary for the proper
functioning of the Court, in accordance with the agreement on the privileges
and immunities of the Court.
5. The
privileges and immunities of:
(a) A judge or the Prosecutor may be waived by
an absolute majority of the judges;
(b) The Registrar may be waived by the Presidency;
(c) The Deputy Prosecutors
and staff of the Office of the Prosecutor may be waived by the Prosecutor;
(d) The Deputy Registrar and staff of the Registry
may be waived by the Registrar.
Article 49
Salaries, allowances and expenses
The judges, the Prosecutor, the Deputy Prosecutors, the Registrar and the
Deputy Registrar shall receive such salaries, allowances and expenses as
may be decided upon by the Assembly of States Parties. These salaries and
allowances shall not be reduced during their terms of office.
Article 50
Official and working languages
1. The
official languages of the Court shall be Arabic, Chinese, English, French,
Russian and Spanish. The judgements of the Court, as well as other decisions
resolving fundamental issues before the Court, shall be published in the
official languages. The Presidency shall, in accordance with the criteria
established by the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, determine which decisions
may be considered as resolving fundamental issues for the purposes of this
paragraph.
2. The
working languages of the Court shall be English and French. The Rules of
Procedure and Evidence shall determine the cases in which other official
languages may be used as working languages.
3. At
the request of any party to a proceeding or a State allowed to intervene
in a proceeding, the Court shall authorize a language other than English
or French to be used by such a party or State, provided that the Court
considers such authorization to be adequately justified.
Article 51
Rules of Procedure and Evidence
1. The
Rules of Procedure and Evidence shall enter into force upon adoption by
a two-thirds majority of the members of the Assembly of States Parties.
2. Amendments
to the Rules of Procedure and Evidence may be proposed by:
(a) Any State Party;
(b) The judges acting by an absolute majority;
or
(c) The Prosecutor.
Such amendments shall enter into force upon adoption by a two-thirds majority
of the members of the Assembly of States Parties.
3. After
the adoption of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, in urgent cases where
the Rules do not provide for a specific situation before the Court, the
judges may, by a two-thirds majority, draw up provisional Rules to be applied
until adopted, amended or rejected at the next ordinary or special session
of the Assembly of States Parties.
4. The
Rules of Procedure and Evidence, amendments thereto and any provisional
Rule shall be consistent with this Statute. Amendments to the Rules of
Procedure and Evidence as well as provisional Rules shall not be applied
retroactively to the detriment of the person who is being investigated
or prosecuted or who has been convicted.
5. In
the event of conflict between the Statute and the Rules of Procedure and
Evidence, the Statute shall prevail.
Article 52
Regulations of the Court
1. The
judges shall, in accordance with this Statute and the Rules of Procedure
and Evidence, adopt, by an absolute majority, the Regulations of the Court
necessary for its routine functioning.
2. The
Prosecutor and the Registrar shall be consulted in the elaboration of the
Regulations and any amendments thereto.
3. The
Regulations and any amendments thereto shall take effect upon adoption
unless otherwise decided by the judges. Immediately upon adoption, they
shall be circulated to States Parties for comments. If within six months
there are no objections from a majority of States Parties, they shall remain
in force.
PART 5. INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION
Article 53
Initiation of an investigation
1. The
Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him
or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there
is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute. In deciding whether
to initiate an investigation, the Prosecutor shall consider whether:
(a) The information available to the Prosecutor
provides a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction
of the Court has been or is being committed;
(b) The case is or would be admissible under article
17; and
(c) Taking into account the gravity of the crime
and the interests of victims, there are nonetheless substantial reasons
to believe that an investigation would not serve the interests of justice.
If the Prosecutor determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed
and his or her determination is based solely on subparagraph (c) above,
he or she shall inform the Pre-Trial Chamber.
2. If,
upon investigation, the Prosecutor concludes that there is not a sufficient
basis for a prosecution because:
(a) There is not a sufficient legal or factual
basis to seek a warrant or summons under article 58;
(b) The case is inadmissible under article 17;
or
(c) A prosecution is not in the interests of justice,
taking into account all the circumstances, including the gravity of the
crime, the interests of victims and the age or infirmity of the alleged
perpetrator, and his or her role in the alleged crime;
the Prosecutor shall inform the Pre-Trial Chamber and
the State making a referral under article 14 or the Security Council in
a case under article 13, paragraph (b), of his or her conclusion and the
reasons for the conclusion.
3. (a)
At the request of the State making a referral under article 14 or the Security
Council under article 13, paragraph (b), the Pre-Trial Chamber may review
a decision of the Prosecutor under paragraph 1 or 2 not to proceed and
may request the Prosecutor to reconsider that decision.
(b) In addition, the Pre-Trial Chamber may, on
its own initiative, review a decision of the Prosecutor not to proceed
if it is based solely on paragraph 1 (c) or 2 (c). In such a case, the
decision of the Prosecutor shall be effective only if confirmed by the
Pre-Trial Chamber.
4. The
Prosecutor may, at any time, reconsider a decision whether to initiate
an investigation or prosecution based on new facts or information.
Article 54
Duties and powers of the Prosecutor with respect to investigations
1. The
Prosecutor shall:
(a) In order to establish the truth, extend the
investigation to cover all facts and evidence relevant to an assessment
of whether there is criminal responsibility under this Statute, and, in
doing so, investigate incriminating and exonerating circumstances equally;
(b) Take appropriate measures to ensure the effective
investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the
Court, and in doing so, respect the interests and personal circumstances
of victims and witnesses, including age, gender as defined in article 7,
paragraph 3, and health, and take into account the nature of the crime,
in particular where it involves sexual violence, gender violence or violence
against children; and
(c) Fully respect the rights of persons arising
under this Statute.
2. The
Prosecutor may conduct investigations on the territory of a State:
(a) In accordance with the provisions of Part 9;
or
(b) As authoriz