At its twenty-eighth
session, in 1976, the Commission requested the Special
Rapporteur for the topic, Abdullah
El-Erian, to prepare a preliminary
report to enable it to take the necessary decisions and to define
its course of action on the second part of the topic of relations
between States and international organizations, namely,
the status, privileges and immunities of international organizations
and their officials, experts and other persons engaged in their
activities who are not representatives of States.
At its twenty-ninth session,
in 1977, the Commission decided to authorize the Special Rapporteur
to continue his study on the lines indicated in his preliminary
report
[1] and to prepare
a further report having regard to the views expressed and the
questions raised during the debate at the twenty-ninth session.
It also decided to authorize the Special Rapporteur to seek additional information and expressed the
hope that he would carry out his research in the customary manner,
namely by investigating the agreements and practices of international
organizations, whether within or outside the United Nations
system, as well as the legislation and practice of States.
In its resolution 32/151 of 19 December 1977 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A),
the General Assembly endorsed the conclusions reached by the
Commission regarding the second part of the topic of relations
between States and international organizations.
At the thirtieth session of
the Commission, in 1978, the Commission approved the conclusions
and recommendations set out in the second report of the Special
Rapporteur
[2] that:
(a)
General agreement existed both in the Commission and in the
Sixth Committee of the General Assembly on the desirability
of the Commission taking up the study of the second part of
the topic “Relations between States and international organizations”;
(b)
The Commission’s work on the second part of the topic should
proceed with great prudence;
(c) For the purposes of its initial work on the second
part of the topic, the Commission should adopt a broad outlook,
inasmuch as the study should include regional organizations.
The final decision on whether to include such organizations
in the eventual codification could be taken only when the study
was completed;
(d) The same broad outlook should be adopted in connection
with the subject matter of the study, inasmuch as the question
of priority would have to be deferred until the study was completed.
At its thirty-first session,
in 1979, the Commission appointed Leonardo Díaz-Gonzalez
as Special Rapporteur
for this part of the topic.
The Commission considered the topic on the basis of the reports of
the new Special Rapporteur,
[3] as well as documents
prepared by the Secretariat, [4] at its thirty-fifth,
thirty-seventh, thirty-ninth,
forty-second
and forty-third sessions,
in 1983, 1985, 1987, 1990 and 1991, respectively. The Commission
proceeded with the first reading of the draft articles on the
basis of the fourth, fifth and sixth reports of the Special
Rapporteur
[5] at its forty-second
and forty-third sessions,
in 1990 and 1991, respectively.
At its forty-fourth session,
in 1992, the Commission noted that the Planning Group had established
a Working Group to review the progress so far achieved on the
topic and to make a recommendation as to whether the Commission
should continue with it and, if in the affirmative, in what
direction. The Commission observed that the discussion of the
first part of the topic, dealing with the status, privileges
and immunities of representatives of States to international
organizations, had resulted in draft
articles which had formed the basis of the 1975
Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations
with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
States had been slow to ratify the Convention or adhere to it
and doubts had therefore arisen as to the advisability of continuing
the work undertaken in 1976 on the second part of the topic,
dealing with the status, privileges and immunities of international
organizations and their personnel, a matter which seemed to
a large extent covered by existing agreements. The Commission
also noted that the passage of time had failed to bring any
sign of increased acceptance of the Convention and the Commission
had not given very active consideration to the topic. Eight
reports had been presented by two successive Special Rapporteurs
and all of the 22 articles contained therein had been referred
to the Drafting Committee, but the Committee had not taken any
action on them. Neither in the Commission nor in the Sixth Committee
had the view been expressed that the topic should be more actively
considered. Under the circumstances, the Commission, accepting
the recommendation of the Planning Group that the topic should
not be pursued further for the time being, decided not to pursue
further during the current term of office of its members the
consideration of the topic, unless the General Assembly decided
otherwise.
The General Assembly, in resolution 47/33 of 25
November 1992 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), endorsed the above decision of the Commission.
|
|