The task of preparing
a draft code of offences against the peace and security of mankind
was entrusted to the Commission in 1947, by General Assembly
resolution 177 (II) of 21 November 1947
(E,
F, S,
R,
C),
the same resolution that requested it to formulate the Nürnberg
principles.
The Commission began its consideration of the draft code of offences
at its first session,
in 1949, when the Commission appointed Jean Spiropoulos
as Special Rapporteur for the subject. It proceeded with its work
at its third, fifth
and sixth sessions, in
1951, 1953 and 1954, respectively. In connection with its work
on the draft code of offences, the Commission had before it
the reports of the Special Rapporteur,
[2] information received
from Governments
[3] as well as documents
prepared by the Secretariat. [4]
At its third session, in 1951,
the Commission completed a draft Code of Offences against the
Peace and Security of Mankind and submitted it to the General
Assembly, together with commentaries thereto. [5]
In the course of the preparation of the text, the Commission considered
that it was not necessary to indicate the exact extent to which
the various Nürnberg
principles had been incorporated in the draft Code. As to
the scope of the draft Code, the Commission decided to limit
the Code to offences containing a political element and endangering
or disturbing the maintenance of international peace and security.
It therefore omitted such matters as piracy, traffic in dangerous
drugs, traffic in women and children, slavery, counterfeiting
of currency, and damage to submarine cables. The Commission
also decided that it would deal only with the criminal responsibility
of individuals and that no provisions should be included with
respect to crimes by abstract entities.
[6] (The Nürnberg
Tribunal had stated in its judgment that: “Crimes against international
law are committed by men, not by abstract entities, and only
by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions
of international law be enforced.”
[7] ) Thus, offences enumerated in the draft Code were characterized as
“crimes under international law, for which the responsible individuals
shall be punishable”.
[8]
The Commission refrained from providing for institutional arrangements
for implementing the Code; it thought that, pending the establishment
of an international criminal court, the Code might be applied
by national courts. [9] As the Commission
deemed it impracticable to prescribe a definite penalty for
each offence, it was left to the competent tribunal to determine
the penalty for any offence under the Code, taking into account
the gravity of the particular offence.
[10]
At its sixth session, in 1951,
the General Assembly postponed consideration of the draft Code
until its next session, in view of the fact that the draft had
only recently been communicated to Governments for comments.
At the Assembly’s seventh
session, in 1952, the item was omitted from the final agenda
on the understanding that the matter would continue to be considered
by the International Law Commission.
The Commission accordingly took up the matter again at its fifth
session, in 1953, and requested the Special Rapporteur, Jean Spiropoulos, to
prepare a new report for submission at the sixth session.
At its sixth session, in 1954,
the Commission considered the report of the Special Rapporteur
[11] which discussed
the observations received from Governments and proposed certain
changes in the text previously adopted by the Commission. The
Commission decided to modify its previous text in certain respects
and added a new offence to the list of crimes, namely, the intervention
by the authorities of a State in the internal or external affairs
of another State by means of coercive measures. It also decided
to omit the condition that inhuman acts against a civil population
were crimes only when committed in connection with other offences
defined in the draft Code. The rule regarding crimes committed
under order by a superior was reworded to say that the perpetrator
of such a crime would be responsible if, under the circumstances
at the time, it was possible for him not to comply with the
order. In addition, the Commission decided to omit the provision
dealing with the punishment of the offences defined in the draft
Code, as the Commission considered that the question of penalties
could more conveniently be dealt with at a later stage, after
it had been decided how the Code was to become operative. [12]
At the same session, the Commission adopted the revised draft
Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind,
with commentaries.
[13]
The General Assembly, in resolution 897 (IX) of 4 December 1954 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), considering that the draft Code raised problems closely related to
that of the definition of aggression, decided to postpone further
consideration of the draft Code until the new special committee
on the question of defining aggression had submitted its report.
The report of the special committee was before the General Assembly
at its twelfth session, in 1957. At that session, the General
Assembly took note of the report and decided to postpone consideration
of the question of aggression to a later stage. In view of that
decision and the consideration that the draft Code raised problems
related to the question of defining aggression, the General
Assembly, in resolution 1186 (XII) of 11 December 1957 (E,
F,
S,
R, C,
A), deferred consideration of the draft Code until such time as it took
up again the question of defining aggression. In the same resolution,
the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to transmit
the text of the draft Code to Member States for comment, and
to submit their replies to the General Assembly at such time
as the item might be placed on its provisional agenda.
The item was brought to the attention of the General Assembly in 1968
and again in 1974. The Assembly decided at its twenty-third
session, in 1968, not to take up the item. At its twenty-ninth
session, in 1974, it decided to consider whether it should take
up again the question of a draft code of offences against the
peace and security of mankind.
The Commission, in its report on the work of its twenty-ninth
session, in 1977, referred to the advisability of the General
Assembly giving consideration to the draft Code, including the
possibility of its review by the Commission if the Assembly
so wished.
[14]
The Assembly, at its thirty-second session, in 1977, acting on the
request of seven Member States, decided to include in its agenda
the item entitled “Draft Code of Offences against the Peace
and Security of Mankind”, and to allocate it to the Sixth Committee.
However, because of lack of time, the Assembly agreed to defer
consideration of the item until its thirty-third session.
[15] At that session,
the General Assembly adopted resolution 33/97 of 16 December
1978 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A),
by which, inter alia, it requested
the Secretary-General to invite Member States and relevant international
intergovernmental organizations to submit their comments and
observations on the draft Code, including comments on the procedure
to be adopted, and to prepare a report to be submitted to the
Assembly at its thirty-fifth session, in 1980.
The comments received further to General Assembly resolution 33/97
were circulated at the thirty-fifth session of the General Assembly,
in 1980. [16] At the same session,
the General Assembly, in resolution 35/49 of 4 December 1980
(E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A),
requested the Secretary-General to reiterate his invitation
to Member States and relevant international intergovernmental
organizations to submit or update their comments and observations
and in particular to inform him of their views on the procedure
to be followed in the future consideration of the item, including
the suggestion to have the item referred to the International
Law Commission.
(See: Draft code of crimes against the peace
and security of mankind (Part II) - including the draft
statute for an international criminal court)