The General Assembly,
in resolution 53/102 of 8 December 1998 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A),
requested the Commission, while continuing its work on prevention,
to examine other issues arising out of the topic, taking into
account comments made by Governments, either in writing or in
the Sixth Committee, and to submit its recommendations on the
future work to be done on these issues to the Sixth Committee.
In his second report,
[1] the Special Rapporteur
on the prevention part of the topic, dealt,
apart from the issues related to the first part of the topic
(prevention), with the treatment of the concept of international
liability in the Commission since the topic was placed on its
agenda; negotiations on liability issues in other international
fora; and options with respect to the future course of action
on the question of liability. The Commission considered the
report at its fifty-first
session, in 1999, and decided to defer the consideration of
the question of international liability, pending completion
of the second reading of the draft articles on the prevention
of transboundary damage from hazardous activities.
The General Assembly, in resolutions 54/111 of 9
December 1999 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A)
and 55/152 of 12 December 2000 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), requested the Commission to resume the consideration of the liability
aspects of the topic as soon as the second reading of the draft
articles on prevention was finalized. The General Assembly,
by resolution 56/82 of 12 December 2001 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), requested the Commission to resume, during its fifty-fourth
session, its consideration of the liability aspects of the topic,
bearing in mind the interrelationship between prevention and
liability, and taking into account the developments in international
law and comments by Governments.
At its fifty-fourth session,
in 2002, the Commission decided to include the topic “International
liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not
prohibited by international law” on its programme of work and
to begin consideration of the second part of the topic “International
liability in case of loss from transboundary harm arising out
of hazardous activities”. The Commission established a Working
Group, chaired by Pemmaraju Sreenivasa Rao, to consider the
conceptual outline of the topic. The Working Group recommended
continuing to limit the scope of the remainder of the topic
concerning liability to the same activities that were covered
under the first part of the topic concerning prevention, which
would effectively link the work on the two parts of the topic.
The Working Group also set out the following initial understandings
on the topic: (a) a threshold would have to be determined to
trigger the application of the regime on allocation of loss
caused; and (b) the loss to be covered should include loss to
(i) persons, (ii) property, including elements of State patrimony
and national heritage, and (iii) environment within national
jurisdiction. The Working Group also considered the approach
to be taken regarding the role of the operator and the State
in the allocation of loss. The Commission adopted the report
of the Working Group, as amended by the Commission. The Commission
also appointed Mr. Rao as Special
Rapporteur for the topic.
[2]
The General Assembly, in resolution 57/21 of 19
November 2002 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), took note of the Commission’s decision to proceed with its work on
the topic, as requested by the Assembly in resolution 56/82.
At its fifty-fifth session,
in 2003, the Commission had before it the Special Rapporteur’s
first report
[3] on the legal regime
for allocation of loss in case of transboundary harm arising
out of hazardous activities. The report reviewed the work of
the Commission in previous years, analysed the liability regimes
of various instruments and offered conclusions for the consideration
of the Commission. After considering the report, the Commission
decided to establish a Working Group, under the chairmanship
of the Special Rapporteur, to assist the Special Rapporteur
in considering the future orientation of the topic in the light
of his report and the debate in the Commission.
[4]
At its
fifty-sixth session, in 2004, the Commission had before it the
second report
[5] of the Special Rapporteur on
the legal regime for the allocation of loss in case of transboundary
harm arising out of hazardous activities. The Commission also
had the Survey of Liability Regimes relevant to the topic, updated
by the Secretariat.
[6] The Commission established a
working group under the chairmanship of Mr. Pemmaraju Sreenivasa
Rao to examine the proposals submitted by the Special Rapporteur,
taking into account the debate in the Commission, with view
to recommending draft principles ripe for referral to the Drafting
Committee, while also continuing discussions on other issues,
including the form that work on the topic should take. In its
work the Working Group reviewed and revised the 12 draft principles
submitted by the Special Rapporteur and it recommended that
the 8 draft principles contained in its report
[7]be referred to the Drafting Committee.
The Commission received the oral report of the Chairman of the
Working Group and decided to refer the eight draft principles
to the Drafting Committee. The Commission also requested the
Drafting Committee to prepare a text of a preamble. The Commission
subsequently considered the report of the Drafting Committee
[8] and adopted on first reading
a set of eight draft principles on the allocation of loss in
the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities.
[9] The Commission also decided,
in accordance with articles 16 and 21 of its Statute
to transmit the draft principles through the Secretary-General,
to Governments for comments and observations, with the request
that such comments and observations be submitted to the Secretary-General
by 1 January 2006.
[10]
The General Assembly, in resolution 59/41 of 2 December 2004
(E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), expressed its appreciation to the International Law Commission
for the completion of the first reading of the draft principles
on the allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm
arising out of hazardous activities, and drew the attention
of Governments to the importance for the International Law Commission
of having their views on the draft principles on Allocation
of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous
activities.