The General Assembly,
by resolution 3501 (XXX) of 15 December 1975 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A),
while reaffirming the need for strict implementation by States
of the provisions of the 1961 Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations, deplored instances of
violations of the rules of diplomatic law and in particular
of the provisions of that Convention. It further invited Member
States to submit to the Secretary-General their comments and
observations on ways and means to ensure the implementation
of the provisions of the Convention as well as on the desirability
of elaborating provisions concerning the status of the diplomatic
courier.
By resolution 31/76 of 13 December 1976 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), the General Assembly, being concerned at continuing instances of
violations of the rules of diplomatic law relating, in particular,
to the status of the diplomatic courier and the diplomatic bag
not accompanied by diplomatic courier, again invited Member
States to comment on the desirability of elaborating provisions
concerning the status of the diplomatic courier with due regard
also to the question of the status of the diplomatic bag not
accompanied by diplomatic courier. At the same time, the Assembly
requested the International Law Commission at the appropriate
time to study the proposals made or to be made by Member States
on the elaboration of a protocol concerning the status of such
courier and bag, which would constitute development and concretization
of the Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
The Commission accordingly included in the agenda of its twenty-ninth
session, in 1977, an item entitled “Proposals on the elaboration
of a protocol concerning the status of the diplomatic courier
and the diplomatic bag not accompanied by diplomatic courier”,
and established a Working Group to ascertain the most suitable
ways and means of dealing with the topic. The Working Group
agreed to recommend a number of conclusions to the Commission, [1] including the
following: (1) the topic should be inscribed on the Commission’s
programme of work for study, as requested by the General Assembly;
(2) the Commission should undertake the study of the topic at
its next session without curtailing the time allocated for the
consideration of the topics on the current programme of work
to which priority had been given pursuant to the relevant recommendations
of the General Assembly and the corresponding decisions of the
Commission; and (3) in order to fulfill this aim, it would seem more appropriate for the Commission
to adopt a procedure similar mutatis mutandis to the one it
followed with respect to the protection and
inviolability of diplomatic agents and other persons by
having the Working Group undertake the first stage of the study
of the topic and report thereon to the Commission without appointing
a Special Rapporteur. The Commission
approved the conclusions reached by the Working Group concerning
the ways and means of dealing with the item.
[2]
At its thirtieth session, in
1978, the Commission reconvened the Working Group, which studied
at that session the proposals for the elaboration of a protocol
as well as the relevant provisions of the 1961 Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the
1963
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the
1969 Convention
on Special Missions, and the 1975 Vienna
Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations
with International Organizations of a Universal Character. The
Working Group adopted as its basic position that the relevant
provisions of those conventions, if any, should form the basis
for any further study of the question. The Working Group tentatively
identified the relevant issues relating to the diplomatic courier
and the diplomatic bag and considered the extent to which these
issues were covered by the conventions. Although the issues
were formulated to apply to the “diplomatic” courier and the
“diplomatic” bag as requested by the General Assembly, some
members of the Working Group were of the view that the issues
were also relevant to other couriers and bags and should eventually
be extended to them as well. The Commission included the report
of the Working Group
[3] in its report
to the General Assembly on the session. [4]
At its thirty-third session, in 1978, the General Assembly discussed
the results of the Commission’s work under two separate agenda
items in the Sixth Committee, namely “Implementation by States
of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
of 1961: report of the Secretary-General” (item 116) and “Report
of the International Law Commission on the work of its thirtieth
session” (item 114). In resolution 33/139 on the latter item,
adopted on 19 December 1978 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), the General Assembly recommended that the Commission should continue
the study, including those issues it had already identified,
concerning the status of the diplomatic courier and the diplomatic
bag not accompanied by diplomatic courier, in the light of comments
made during the debate on the item in the Sixth Committee at
the thirty-third session of the General Assembly and comments
to be submitted by Member States, with a view to the possible
elaboration of an appropriate legal instrument. With regard
to the former item, the Assembly adopted, on the same day, resolution
33/140 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A). The Assembly noted with appreciation the study by the Commission
of the proposals on the elaboration of a protocol which could
constitute a further development of international diplomatic
law, decided that it would give further consideration to this
question and expressed the view that, unless Member States indicated
the desirability of an earlier consideration, it would be appropriate
to do so when the International Law Commission submitted to
the Assembly the results of its work on the possible elaboration
of an appropriate legal instrument on the topic.
At its thirty-first session,
in 1979, the Commission again re-established a Working Group,
which studied issues on the status of the diplomatic courier
and the diplomatic bag not accompanied by diplomatic courier.
The results of the study were set out in the Commission’s report
to the General Assembly.
[5] At the same session,
the Commission decided to appoint Alexander Yankov
as Special Rapporteur for the topic.
The Commission proceeded with its work on the topic from its thirty-second
to thirty-eighth sessions
and at its fortieth
and forty-first sessions,
from 1980 to 1986 and in 1988 and 1989, respectively. In connection
with its consideration of the topic, the Commission had before
it the reports of the Special Rapporteur,
[6] information provided
by Governments
[7] as well as documents
prepared by the Secretariat. [8]
The Commission began the first reading of the draft articles at its
thirty-third session,
in 1981, which was completed at its thirty-eighth
session, in 1986. The draft adopted on first reading was transmitted,
in accordance with articles 16 and 21 of the Commission’s Statute,
through the Secretary-General, to Governments for comments and
observations.
The General Assembly, in resolutions 41/81 of 3
December 1986 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A),
and 42/156 of 7 December 1987 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), inter alia, urged Governments to give full
attention to the request of the Commission for comments and
observations on the draft articles adopted on first reading
by the Commission.
At its fortieth session, in
1988, the Commission began the second reading of the draft articles.
It re-examined the draft articles on the basis of the eighth
report submitted by the Special Rapporteur.
[9] In that report,
the Special Rapporteur analysed the comments and observations of Governments
in connection with each draft article and proposed the revision
of certain draft articles. In his view, the elaboration of the
draft articles should be based on a comprehensive approach leading
to a coherent and, as much as possible, uniform regime concerning
all kinds of couriers and bags. He also underscored the significance
which should be attached to functional necessity as the basic
factor in determining the status of all kinds of couriers and
bags. These considerations of the Special Rapporteur
were generally shared by the Commission.
At its forty-first session,
in 1989, the Commission adopted the final text of thirty-two
draft
articles on the status of the diplomatic courier and the diplomatic
bag not accompanied by diplomatic courier, as a whole, as well
as a draft optional protocol on the status of the courier and
the bag of special missions, and a draft optional protocol on
the status of the courier and the bag of international organizations
of a universal character, with commentaries
thereto.
[10] In accordance
with article 23 of its Statute,
the Commission decided to recommend to the General Assembly
that it convene an international conference of plenipotentiaries
to study the draft articles and the optional protocols and to
conclude a convention on the subject. [11]
By its resolution 44/36 of 4 December 1989 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A), the General Assembly decided to hold at its forty-fifth session,
in 1990, informal consultations, in the framework of the Sixth
Committee, to study the draft articles on the status of the
diplomatic courier and the diplomatic bag not accompanied by
diplomatic courier, the draft optional protocols thereto, as
well as the question of how to deal further with those draft
instruments with a view to facilitating the reaching of a generally
acceptable decision in the latter respect. Those consultations
were continued at the forty-sixth and forty-seventh sessions,
pursuant to General Assembly resolutions 45/43 of 28 November 1990
(E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A)
and
46/57 of 9
December 1991 (E,
F,
S,
R,
C,
A).
Various proposals were made to reconcile the divergences of
views which existed on some articles, in particular article
28 on the inviolability of the bag, but no agreement was reached.
On the recommendation of the Sixth Committee, the General Assembly
decided, by its decision 47/415 of 25 November 1992, that the informal consultations would be resumed at the fiftieth
session, in 1995.
At its fiftieth session, in 1995, the General Assembly adopted decision
50/416 of 11 December 1995, by which it decided to bring the
draft articles, together with the observations made during the
debates on them in the Sixth Committee, to the attention of
Member States, and to remind Member States of the possibility
that this field of international law and any further developments
within it may be subject to codification at an appropriate time
in the future.